Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Winding v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, MDCO Commissioner Burl Cain, MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Lee County
as 1:2020cv00215
Plaintiff:
Bobby Senoris Thompson
Defendant:
Lee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thompson v. Lee County et al
as 1:2020cv00140
Defendant:
Judy Smith, Medical and Lee County
Plaintiff:
Bobby Senoris Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hypes v. DeSoto County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Hypes
Defendant:
DeSoto County Jail, Chad Wicker, April Box and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilworth v. Funderburk et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
IanCharles D. Dilworth
Defendant:
Paul S. Funderburk, Luanne Thompson, Unknown District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
G. D. Thompson
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Lee Simon, Capt. Rein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
DeSoto County Sheriff's Department, Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Earnest Lee, Marilyn Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Marco Sanchez Rice
Defendant:
Clarissa Williams, T. Orr, Verlena Flaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
