Cases 1 - 10 of 40
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv03866
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JAMES ANDREW LOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 1:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
JARREL JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, LEONARD VANDERLINDE, JULIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COX
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, JENNIFER DAVIS, JEQUAN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. U.S. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02531
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE BOARD, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and JEQUAN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CABEZAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv02484
Defendant:
STABENOW, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Plaintiff:
DOW and ANDREW F. CABEZAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JOHNSTON v. WRAY
as 1:2020cv02198
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JAMES JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BROWN v. KASECAMP
as 1:2020cv00877
Defendant:
ANDREW KASECAMP
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
