Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beckwith v. Manzella et al
as 3:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Sgt. Manzella, Dep. Reid, Devaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckwith v. Mason et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Dep. Mason, Dep. D. Jung, Dep. Babock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriffs et al
as 3:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Renardo Artez Mitchell
Defendant:
Multnomah County Deputy Sheriffs, Deputy Jane Doe, Sgt. A. Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Reid et al
as 3:2021cv01404
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Reid, Lloyd, Emmiet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00564
Defendant:
C.O. Carbjhack, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clardy v. Bryant-Kaae et al
as 2:2016cv02092
Defendant:
Jason Bell, David Blankfeld, Cathy Bryant-Kaae and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrar et al v. Peters et al
as 6:2015cv00618
Defendant:
E. Bryant, T. Byerly, C. Coffey and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv00764
Defendant:
Officer Bryant, Sgt. Hugulet and Multnomah County
Name Unknown:
Commander of County Jail
Plaintiff:
James Albert Jackson
Known As Inverness Jail:
Medical and Nursing Staff of Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
