Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Burkes v. John Does
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Travis Burkes
Defendant:
John Does
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruse Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andrew c. Cruse Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Cheif Medical Director Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Barber v. Burke et al
as 4:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Barber
Defendant:
P. Pennington, individual capacity, P. Wiliey, individual capacity, James Burke, individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ewing v. Burke et al
as 5:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronnell Ewing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ms N. Reed and Dr. J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Attala County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Dr. Kypier, Zeeley Shaw, Dr. Santose and others
Plaintiff:
William Austin Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Barber v. Burke et al
as 4:2018cv00149
Defendant:
P. Riley, Dr. James Burke and R. Pennington
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Yelverton v. Walker et al
as 5:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Toxie Yelverton, III
Defendant:
Walker, Burke, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yelverton v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
James Toxie Yelverton, III
Defendant:
Walker, Burke, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Phor et al
as 3:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Payne
Defendant:
Phor, Da'Kenya McDavis and Mrs. Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winder v. J. et al
as 4:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Anthony Winder
Defendant:
Burke J., Annie Bouler, Madubuonwu Parl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
