Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Alvarez v. Huber et al
as 1:2024cv04668
Plaintiff:
Aldo Alvarez
Defendant:
Kyle Huber and Carlos Vera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04874
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Patrick
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Arnulfo Gomez, Chicago Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cregan v. Doe, et al
as 1:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dax Cregan
Defendant:
John Doe, Chicago Police Department and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Carlos Epps
Defendant:
Warden Sproul, AW Sosa, AW LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marks II v. Rossi et al
as 3:2021cv50349
Plaintiff:
Cedric J. Marks II
Defendant:
Jason Rossi, Daniel Monaco, Carlos Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Zenoff et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
McLaren, Hutchinson, Robert J. Mangan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. One Unknown Ice Officer et al
as 1:2021cv02748
Plaintiff:
Louise Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Kolitwenzew, One Unknown Ice Officer, Kankakee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Moore et al
as 1:2021cv01614
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Supervisor E. Akpore and Parole Agent G. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Boccassini et al
as 1:2019cv08484
Defendant:
M.J. Boccassini, M.E. Wilson and R. BorJas
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Waukegan Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv05734
Plaintiff:
Luis H. Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Jay Tapia, Joe Florip and Waukegan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
