Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Gaines v. City Of Oakland
as 1:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2020cv07068
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, Anne Kirkpatrick, Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius A. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2017cv05238
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah Jefferson, et al
as 17-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMILAH A. JEFFERSON, OTIS JR. MCGEE and CITY OF OAKLAND
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah Jefferson, et al
as 16-16657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMILAH A. JEFFERSON, OTIS JR. MCGEE and CITY OF OAKLAND
Ray v. Jefferson et al
as 4:2016cv02652
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamilah A. Jefferson, Otis McGee, Jr. and City of Oakland, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of California et al
as 3:2014cv02495
Plaintiff:
LaPatrick A. Johnson
Defendant:
State of California and City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Caesar Basa, et al
as 13-17393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CAESAR BASA, OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CA and others
James v. Oakland Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lamar James, Jr.
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, Ko, Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
