Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Wood v. Montana 1st Judicial District et al
as 6:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Wood
Defendant:
Montana 1st Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County Attorney's Office and Montana Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. State of Montana
as 9:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Daniel Felix Finley
Defendant:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Beaverhead County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Beaverhead County Detention Center, Silverbow County Public Defender's Office and Walter Hennessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Harrington
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Daniels
Defendant:
Beverly Renae Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Rosenquist et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Daniels
Defendant:
Ingrid A Rosenquist, Scott Twito, April Huelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxin v. Heartfor
as 4:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Maxin
Defendant:
Brandon Heartfor and Brandon Heartford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prochaska v. Contreraz et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
John Pearson and Nathan Contreraz
Plaintiff:
Dalton Daniel Prochaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguado v. Stillwater County et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Marilynn Kober, Jennifer Siegfried and others
Plaintiff:
Denis F. Aguado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinner v. Fox et al
as 4:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Pinner
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Joel Thompson, Daniel Guzynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spinks v. Fode et al
as 6:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Spinks
Defendant:
Alvin Fode, Amie Daniels, Dianne Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
