Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 667
Lettieri v. Nilson
as 2:2024cv02130
Plaintiff: David Lettieri
Defendant: Nicholas Nilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Hermann et al
as 3:2024cv01422
Plaintiff: Billy Miles
Defendant: C/O Hermann and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff: Billy Miles
Defendant: John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff: Billy Miles
Defendant: John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01281
Plaintiff: Thomas Flakes
Defendant: David W. Mitchell, Michael T. Bailey, Brandon Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff: Billy Miles
Defendant: John Doe #1 and David Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Compact Industries Inc.
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff: David Lettieri
Defendant: Compact Industries Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dampier v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff: Ray Timothy Damper and Ray Timothy Dampier
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Mayor of Robbins Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff: David Campbell
Defendant: Mayor of Robbins Illinois, Chief of Police and Sharon Dyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett Jr. v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff: Jay Bennett Jr. and Jay Bennett, Jr.
Defendant: David Mitchell, Christal Crow, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?