Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vicente v. Ayotte et al
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Marc Ayotte, Kyle Conrad, Orlando Poventud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Parsons et al
as 3:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Ryan Parsons, Peter Pietraroia, Steven Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughan v. Chevalier et al
as 3:2020cv01799
Defendant:
Ackerman, Carbonneau, Rossini and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliday v. Newington Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv01930
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Federal Credit Union, VA Police Dept, Gregory E Augustine and others
Plaintiff:
Dean B. Holliday, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard Benson
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, Dean Esserman, Brendon Borer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Martin Melvin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00764
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Commission of the Department of Correction, Santiago, Sofia Dicuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vallancourt v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Tom Vallancourt
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Erfe, Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Esserman et al
as 3:2013cv01059
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Defendant:
Dean Esserman, Johnson, J. Murpht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
