Cases 1 - 10 of 80
BURTCH v. FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE, et al v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE, MASON DEAN and RONALD GLEEN RICE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. GEORGIA et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR and BRICKS
Defendant:
State of Georgia, CAPTAIN ULM and TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. GEORGIA et al
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR and BRICKS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, CAPTAIN ULM and TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONK v. LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE MONK, JR
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF LARRY DEAN and CAPTAIN DONELLE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DEAN MURRAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN SMITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MONIQUE HOLLIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. MOSLEY et al
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN JONES
Defendant:
SHANNON MOSLEY and PRIYANKA BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
