Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Matthew Powell v. M. Barron, et al
as 18-15605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW LAMONT POWELL, AKA Matthew Powell
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARRON, Correctional Officer @ CSP-Corcoran, R. GOINGS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, I. RIVERA, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran and others
Ayobi v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv00693
Plaintiff:
Shajia Ayobi
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams and Barbara Showalter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Powell v. M. Barron, et al
as 16-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW LAMONT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARRON, Correctional Officer @ CSP-Corcoran, R. GOINGS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, I. RIVERA and others
Matthew Powell v. Barron et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Powell
Defendant:
M. Barron, R. Goings, I. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Vargas v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 13-16865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR M. VARGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN L. HUBBARD, RAUL LOPEZ, Warden, DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and others
Atkins v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Otis Atkins
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, A. Musleh and Rubbacaba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Jacobs, IV v. S. Sztukowski, et al
as 13-15451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV
Defendant:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, A. C. QUINONES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MASIEL, B. DAVID and J. M. MARTINEZ
Marcus Williams v. Derral Adams, et al
as 13-15148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS R. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, T. WAN, R. HANSEN and others
Genghis Stevenson v. Derral Adams, et al
as 12-17665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, S. ROUSSEAU, GIBSON and others
Darrell Lowe v. Derral Adams, et al
as 12-16505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL LOWE
Defendant:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJID RAHIMFAR, Dr., WILLIAM J. MCGUINNESS and MARY CALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
