Cases 1 - 10 of 10
David Sconce v. Roger Diamond et al
as 2:2021cv07926
Plaintiff:
David W. Sconce
Defendant:
Attorney Roger Diamond, Harvey Giss and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dominic Vargas and Diamond Vargas
Defendant:
Statewide Medical Authorization Review Team, C. Pierini, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 2:2018cv05883
Defendant:
Marc Diamond
Plaintiff:
William Washington and William Nathaniel Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Nathaniel Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 2:2017cv00666
Defendant:
Marc Diamond and Marc Diamond
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
William Nathaniel Washington v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv09375
Defendant:
Police Chief Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles, Detective Marc Diamond and others
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
William N Washington v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv07429
Defendant:
Captain Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles, Marc Diamond and others
Plaintiff:
William N Washington
William N Washington v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv05873
Defendant:
Officer Argota, Officer Argota, Charlie Beck and others
Plaintiff:
William N Washington
Rivera v. Diamond
as 3:2009cv05863
Plaintiff:
James Earl Rivera
Defendant:
Gary M. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Braga, et al
as 2:2009cv00763
Plaintiff:
Armando Abreu
Defendant:
F. Braga, R. Diamond, Rosanne Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. Merkle, et al
as 2:1996cv01227
Plaintiff:
Patrick Anthony Martinez
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, R A Gile , S C Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
