Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DIAMOND v. SMITH
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Defendant:
ARNEIKA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAIR v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR RANDY HOWARD, INVESTIGATOR TENNELL, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv04764
Defendant:
Jack Sauls, Aretha Smith, Rodney Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Floyd County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Bobby Sapp, Tim Burkhalter, Tom Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Alton Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith Diamond Dutch v. Rugby Dandruff Shampoo et al
as 1:2019cv03640
Defendant:
Rugby Dandruff Shampoo and DeKalb County Jail Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Brittani Emanuel Billionaire Car Smith Diamond Dutch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Floyd County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 4:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ashley Alton Diamond
Defendant:
Floyd County Sheriff's Dept, Tim Burkhalter, Christopher Parton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Floyd County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 4:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ashley Alton Diamond
Defendant:
Floyd County Sheriffs Dept, Tim Burkhalter, Christopher Parton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Dean et al
as 4:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
Van Anthony Diamond
Defendant:
Scott Dean, Tony Mitchell and Robert Bourbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
