Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gonzalez v. Lai et al
as 3:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Salvador Gonzalez
Defendant:
Chrispher Lai, (FNU) Mendoza, (FNU) Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgers v. Uribe, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv01880
Plaintiff:
Michael Lydell Burgers
Defendant:
Domingo Uribe, Jr., Amy Miller, J. Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Gomez et al
as 3:2013cv01862
Plaintiff:
James H. Garcia
Defendant:
A. Gomez, Alan Hernandez, J. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saleem et al v. Zamora et al
as 3:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Abdul Matin Saleem
Defendant:
J. Zamora, Steve Francis, Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maquinales v. Uribe et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard Maquinales
Defendant:
Domingo Uribe, Jr., N. Lamont, Rose Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Kevin Henry v. Robert B Taylor et al
as 2:2012cv08023
Plaintiff:
Edward Kevin Henry
Defendant:
Probation Officer Robert B Taylor, Probation Officer Robert B Taylor and Warden Domingo Uribe, Jr
Hill v. Uribe et al
as 3:2012cv01087
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hill
Defendant:
Domingo Uribe, Jr., Matthew Cate, M. Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nava v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher Nava
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Edmund Gerry Brown, Domingo Uribe, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salcedo v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv02859
Plaintiff:
Jose Salcedo
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Edmund G. Brown, Domingo Uribe, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. California, State of et al
as 3:2011cv02748
Plaintiff:
Michael X Pearson , Jermaine X Pina and Raymond X Scott
Defendant:
California, State of, State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
