Cases 1 - 10 of 389
(PC) James v. Michelle et al
as 2:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Michelle and Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Fadika
as 2:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Nicolofar Fadika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant:
Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Dominisse et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Domimisse, Juan Corona, Isaac W. Choy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Nicole M. Cahill and D. Van Longyear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Alex Villanueva et al
as 2:2023cv09943
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Alex Villanueva, Blaylock, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Colis v. Watson et al
as 1:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dale Colis
Defendant:
Ronald Watson and Tuolumne Co Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jay Eugene Joseph Reid
Defendant:
Rivera, Essex and Garica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gray v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gray
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
