Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SEAN MAGUIRE, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
TRAVIS ANDREWS, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADU v. WALTZ et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant:
CASEY CHADWICK and GARY WALTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS v. WALTZ et al
as 1:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
NIXON LOUIS
Defendant:
GARY WALTZ, DAVID ALLEN and JOHN DILLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAVALHO v. BURNHEIMER et al
as 2:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CRAVALHO
Defendant:
SCOTT BURNHEIMER , JEFFREY MERRILL , SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTE v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MAYNARD COTE
Defendant:
PATRICIA BARNHART, ERIC BEUNO, RUSTY WORCESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOLEY v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FOLEY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al
as 1:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Defendant:
RICHARD LAHAYE, JR, JESSICA DANIELSON, MICHAEL LARRIVEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFLAND v. PERKINS et al
as 1:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Defendant:
GEORGE F PERKINS, SUSAN PERKINS, GARY BOYNTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SACRED FEATHER NATIVE AMERICAN CIRCLE et al v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
COTE CHONESKA , MICHAEL THOMPSON , JEREMY STEVENS and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY MERRILL , LEIDA DARDIS , MATT KANTROWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
