Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Dixon v. Glynn County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Glynn County Sheriff Officials, State of Georgia Attorney, Glynn County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
La Darrelle R. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Glynn County Superior Court
as 2:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Gilmore
Defendant:
Glynn County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Aaron Stephen v. Glynn County Detention Center
as 17-13549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON LANCE STEPHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
GLYNN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Stephen v. Glynn County Detention Center
as 2:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lance Stephen
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guest v. Glynn County, Georgia et al
as 2:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Matthew Guest
Defendant:
Glynn County, Georgia , Wayne V. Bennett and Marcus F. Lanier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Anthony F. Morris
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center and Jeffrey Gunderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Public Defender Office et al
as 2:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ervin Singleton
Defendant:
Public Defender Office, Glynn County and Chad Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rohwedder v. Glynn County Superior Court et al
as 2:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Rohwedder
Defendant:
Glynn County Superior Court and State Of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batson v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carlvus DeAngelo Batson
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Dr. Garner, Nurse Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses Lewis v. Glynn County Detention Center, et al
as 10-12359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GLYNN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WAYNE BENNETT, Sheriff, LOUISE CLIFTON NEWSOME and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
