Cases 1 - 10 of 74
(PC) Bradford v. Withrow et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Patrick Withrow, Samuel Cortez, Pattersson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lynch v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Lynch
Defendant:
P. J. Jones, Brizindine, Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Barrios et al
as 1:2020cv01405
Defendant:
A. Duran, B. Lee, K. Lopez-Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garcia v. Holland, et al.
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
R. Escarcega, D. Mason, W. J. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II et al
as 1:2018cv01697
Defendant:
Sergeant Roacha, Stu Sherman, M. Solario and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Rashid et al
as 2:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
Tyree Washington
Defendant:
T. Rashid, D. Gonzales, V. Willick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Jones
as 2:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Canada
Defendant:
J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
P. J. Jones, J. Needham, Anne Reasoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016at00049
Plaintiff:
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Kim Holland, J. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Kim Holland, J Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
