Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ja-Ron Teague v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 10-5625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, ROBERT HUBER, Jailer, Simpson County Jail, GERALD BESHEAR and others
Teague v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Marion County Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Jeff Burton, Barry Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague, Terrance Johnson and Darrie Rushin
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Robert Huber, Gerald Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steve Beshear, Janie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ja-Ron Teague v. Louisville Metro Government
as 09-5608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT
Ja-Ron Teague v. Louisville Metro Government
as 09-5607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT
Ja-Ron Teague v. KY, et al
as 09-5593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CITY OF LOUISVILLE, LOUISVILLE METRO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and others
Ja-Ron Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 09-5587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steve Besher, Ernie Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
