Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Reese v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2015cv01633
Defendant:
John Billage, Connie Bisbee, Miss Caulderwood and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shropshire v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00164
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Gregory Cox and Lisa Walsh
Plaintiff:
William Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vigoa Perez v. Cox et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Harold Mike Byrne, James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Vigoa Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCabe v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2014cv00346
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Arianas, Warden Isidro Baca, Doctor Robert Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sooga v. Aranas et al
as 2:2014cv00816
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Robert Bannister, James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tuiofu Sooga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jerry Hooks v. Bruce Bannister, et al
as 14-15476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY HOOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE R. BANNISTER, RONALD BRYANT, HAROLD BYRNE and others
Hooks v. Bannister et al
as 3:2012cv00682
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Ronald Bryant, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
George v. N.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00991
Defendant:
James Gregory Cox, S. Espinoza, N.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
David George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Dennie v. Brian Williams, et al
as 12-15764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN DENNIE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, CHERYL BURSON and JAMES GREGORY COX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.