Cases 1 - 10 of 605
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
David Lee White
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Valdez M. Nelson Guzman, S. Colin Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Butler v. Doe I et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II and FNU Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
