Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Williams v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Early et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis
Defendant:
Ms Early, C Garrett and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napier v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Jamy Napier
Defendant:
John Doe, Nurse Doe, Doctor Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Toney Edwards, Eric Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Thompson et al
as 1:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kentrell James
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickson v. Haulcy et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Capt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office (EBRSO), et al.
as 3:2023cv00197
Defendant:
Arton Floyd, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office (EBRSO) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Caballero v. Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Saul Caballero
Defendant:
Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic, Dr Braud, Jhon Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hawkins v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2022cv06218
Plaintiff:
Emile Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriff of Jefferson Davis Parish, Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
