Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Ryles et al
as 2:2019cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert D Spivey
Defendant:
J Salles, R Ryles and John Doe/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraway v. Emitt et al
as 4:2016cv03617
Plaintiff:
Robinson Edward Caraway
Defendant:
Ed Emitt, Ron Hickman, Sergeant Wolfford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deanda v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
Johnny Deanda
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe Agents Actors, Employees and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deanda v. Owens et al
as 3:2010cv01125
Plaintiff:
Johnny Deanda
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, John Doe, Jane Doe Agents Actors Employees, John Doe, Jane Doe Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Doe et al
as 4:2009cv00527
Petitioner:
Troy Dale Johnston
Respondent:
John Doe/Jane Doe, William J Edmonds, Sharon Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottson v. Gotson et al
as 5:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Gottson
Defendant:
Albert Gotson, Jr., J.P. Morgan Chase of J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, M. Tracy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
