Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Tomlin v. Smolke et al
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tomlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Smolke, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
John Rivello, Captain Long, Lieutenant Yonkers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. West et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
C.O. West, Sgt. Hemperly, Deputy Superintendent Banta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Corrections Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Correctional Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MAPLE v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAPLE
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, LAWRENCE J GOODE, COLE STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Payne
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
