Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Robert Demos et al v. The State Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2019cv08043
Defendant:
The Governor of The State of California, The Governor of The State of South Dakota, The Virginia Company and others
Plaintiff:
John R Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H. and John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Google et al
as 4:2019cv04433
Defendant:
Instagram, Pennzoil, Mobil and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Colorado, U.S. Maritime Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02632
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Yahoo Inc, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Robert Demos v. Intel Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07547
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
John Doe and Intel Corporation
John Robert Demos, Jr. v. The USA et al
as 2:2015cv05912
Defendant:
Jimmy Carter, William J. Clinton, Gerald Ford and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Demos v. The State of Washington
as 5:2014cv05474
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Washington, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, US Maritime Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Reagan et al
as 5:2011cv04069
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2010cv01003
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States of America and Washington State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
