Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ledcke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2015cv02137
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant:
John T Rathman, Becky Clay, Walter Vereen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boykin v. Rathman
as 1:2014cv00957
Plaintiff:
Doncey Frank Boykin
Defendant:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. Burns et al
as 2:2013cv00550
Plaintiff:
Prince Isaac
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Steven Burns, James Preston, Honorio Delacruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Norwood
Defendant:
John T. Rathman and Mark Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, John T. Rathman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Terrell v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv03717
Plaintiff:
Brooks James Terrell
Defendant:
John T. Rathman, Walter Vareen, Becky Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Futch v. Rathman
as 1:2011cv03549
Plaintiff:
John Randall Futch
Defendant:
John T. Rathman
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Gary C Walker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman, B Alley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
