Cases 1 - 10 of 1,419
Howard, Earnest v. Broward County Clerk of Courts et al
as 0:2024cv61048
Plaintiff:
Earnest Howard
Defendant:
Broward County Clerk of Courts, Terrance Olivier and Janice Mary John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. JEAFFRESON
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
JOHN CORDY JEAFFRESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lawson v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2024cv14164
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Major B. Stephenson, Captain J. Binsee, Officer B. Saintil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv14163
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Officer J. Miller, Sergeant V. Maldonado, Officer T. Rueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Hendricks et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Omar Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristin K. Hendricks, John O'Connor, Erin Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
