Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel Ruiz v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 24-1853
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL RUIZ
Defendant:
J.B. PRITZKER, in their official capacities, ROB JEFFREYS, EDITH CRIGLER and others
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avant v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heather v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
Robert P Heather, Jr
Defendant:
James Brown, Brendon Kelly, Tracie Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv06780
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul and Glenn J Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Raphael Taylor
Defendant:
State of Illinois, District II Chicago Police Station, District II Chicago Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Trent Warren
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Prisoner Review Board, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
