Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Reed v. Carpenelli et al
as 9:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Benji D. Reed
Defendant:
Michael Carpenelli, Timothy Thayer, James Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jewell v. Mulligan et al
as 7:2022cv02693
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jewell
Defendant:
Daniel Mulligan, Peter Link, Michel Blot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susana v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 1:2021cv09127
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Susana
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Seven Unknown DOE Agentsof DHS/CDF/Oasis/Global Tel Link and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Oneida County et al
as 9:2019cv01629
Defendant:
SM Dental, Anthony Picente, Peter Rayhill and others
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barragan v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04321
Plaintiff:
Jerson Barragan
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global TEL-Link/AdvancePay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04163
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link/Advance Pay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercedes v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04087
Plaintiff:
Leibys Mercedes
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Advance Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Din v. Link et al
as 1:2017cv01065
Plaintiff:
Ah Din
Defendant:
Link and Nurse Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
McIntosh v. Reaves Jr. et al
as 6:2015cv06209
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
Bing Reaves Jr., City of Rochester, New York, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
