Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shabondy Simpson v. N. Feltsen, et al
as 11-15001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHABONDY LAMAR SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
N. FELTSEN, M. C. KRAMER, J. BRODDRICK and others
Gilbert Serrano, Sr. v. C. Romo, et al
as 10-15923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT ISRAEL SERRANO, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. B. ROMO, Correctional Officer, MCGUIRE, Correctional Officer, ESTRADA, Correctional Officer and others
Robert Ellis v. M. Kramer, et al
as 10-15832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. C. KRAMER, Warden and DARNELL, Lt.
Billy Lacey v. Dominguez, et al
as 10-15176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY J. LACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINGUEZ, Correctional Officer, P. VERA, M. C. KRAMER and others
White v. Ervin, Jr. et al
as 2:2009st02475
Plaintiff:
Diwon White
Defendant:
D. Ervin, Jr., D. Harris, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
White v. Ervin, Jr. et al
as 2:2009cv03475
Plaintiff:
Diwon White
Defendant:
D. Ervin, Jr., D. Harris, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Kramer et al
as 2:2009cv02441
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Ellis
Defendant:
M. C. Kramer and Darnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Feltsen, et al.
as 2:2009cv00302
Plaintiff:
Shabondy Lamar Simpson
Defendant:
N Feltson, M. C. Kramer, J Broddrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2008cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kashley Roy Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
