Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dackerie Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Lt Evans, Molley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Dennell Linn Lee and Denell Linn Lee
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Caddo Parish, Sergeant Taylor, Deputy Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv00587
Defendant:
Sgt Englade, Steve Prator, Captain Farris and others
Plaintiff:
Jakarris Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Claiborne Parish et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gabriel D McClain
Defendant:
Danny Newell, Adrian Malone, Sheriffs Dept Claiborne Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Russell et al
as 3:2018cv00935
Defendant:
Jay Russell, Pat Johnson and Scott Smith
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone and **Sanctioned/Barred* Cary Ellis Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Russell et al
as 3:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone
Defendant:
Jay Russell, Pat Johnson, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone
Defendant:
LA Dept of Probation & Parole, Debra Bradford and Holly Chambers Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Tuten et al
as 3:2017cv00853
Plaintiff:
Bruce T Malone
Defendant:
Jim Tuten, Pat Johnson, Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone
Defendant:
LA Dept of Safety & Corrections and Debra Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
