Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Juan Valdez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00334
Plaintiff:
Juan Valdez
Defendant:
United States of America , Federal Bureau of Prisons , Management and Training Corporation (MTC) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kasirem v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00312
Plaintiff:
Avinash Kasirem
Defendant:
The United States of America , Federal Bureau of Prisons , Management and Training Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moshe Leichner v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv02317
Defendant:
Michael Benov, George Buehler, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Moshe Leichner
Masoud Bamdad v. Warden Michael Benov et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Defendant:
Mr Ali, Mr Ali, Michael Benov and others
Plaintiff:
Masoud Bamdad
Geiger v. Benov et al
as 1:2011cv01857
Defendant:
Michael Benov and Taft Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Dan S. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brian Lee Hanson Jr v. Subnoski
as 2:2011cv07586
Defendant:
Michael Benov and Dr Subnoski
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Hanson, Jr
Mary Johnson v. USDOJ, et al
as 11-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, KATHLEEN HAWK-SWAYERD and others
Kennenth Riley v. Michael Benov et al
as 2:2010cv01285
Defendant:
Michael Benov, Michael Benov, Ms. Virginia Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Riley
Tyrone Douglas Lowe v. Michael Benov et al
as 2:2009cv03727
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Douglas Lowe
Defendant:
Michael Benov, Carlos Deveza, Arafiles Nicolas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Moshe Leichner v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Moshe Leichner
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Benov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
