Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McDonald v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kenn McDonald
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Hutchings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01329
Defendant:
J. Edmerson, Warden Brian Williams, Associate Warden Jennifer Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Prater et al
as 2:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Warden Brian Williams, James Dzurenda, D Prater and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv03066
Defendant:
Howell, Jennifer Nash, Lt. Potter and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mconald v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv02572
Defendant:
Alvarado, Associate Warden Jennifer Nash, Lt Potter and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frostick v. Luem et al
as 2:2014cv00804
Plaintiff:
David M. Frostick
Defendant:
Andrea Luem, Patrick McDonald, Michael H. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Olivas et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
Allen, Ball, R. Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Bannister et al
as 3:2012cv00682
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Ronald Bryant, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Baros et al
as 3:2011cv00483
Defendant:
Baros, Quentin Byrne, James Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Hoover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Dixion et al
as 3:2011cv00240
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Debra Brooks, Quintin Byrnes and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
