Frostick v. Luem et al
| David M. Frostick |
| Andrea Luem, Patrick McDonald, Michael H. Schwarz, Arnold Weinstock, Coyne, Lee, Boucher, Rogers and Dan Winder |
| 2:2014cv00804 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A Leen |
| James C Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Extend Time. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/2/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Enlarge Time (First Request) to File re Direct Appeal from the Nevada Supreme Court by Plaintiff David M. Frostick. (address/inmate number updated to High Desert State Prison #1168111 as listed on document - SLD) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David M. Frostick. (SLD) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff David M. Frostick without prejudice. This court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 6/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Boucher, Coyne, Lee, Andrea Luem, Patrick McDonald, Rogers, Michael H. Schwarz, Arnold Weinstock, Dan Winder filed by David M. Frostick. (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (SLD) |
|
Filing 4
SCREENING ORDER Granting Plaintiff's #3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis but must pay an initial installment of the filing fee in the amount of $50.87. Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order Plaintiff shall pay the initial installment of the filing fee to the Clerk of Court. The Clerk shall file the Plaintiff's #1 -1, #1 -2 Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a habeas corpus petition and an in forma pauperis application in a new action, but may not file any further documents in this action. This court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: CCDC Accounting Supervisor; copies and forms mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David M. Frostick. Motion ripe 6/4/2014. (SLD) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that Plaintiff's #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperisis Denied without prejudice to file a new application. Within 30 days from the date of this order Plaintiff shall either file a complete Application to Proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $400. The Clerk of the Court shall retain the #1 -1, #1 -2 Complaint but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - forms mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David M. Frostick. Motion ripe 5/21/2014. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Part 2)(SLD) |
| Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (JAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
