Cases 1 - 10 of 606
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
SNYDER et al v. WASHINGTON NATIONALS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
NICK SNYDER and DAVID COYNE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NATIONALS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coyne et al v. Parkside Credit Union et al
as 9:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Morgan Coyne and Kevin Pearson
Defendant:
Parkside Credit Union, Experian Corp., Equifax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Garcia v. Terrico et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dari Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Christine Terrico, Dr. Christopher Salas, NP Taborelli Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Gino Rotondo, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Kimberly Kane, Lori Ventituolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
