Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Norris v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Donald E Norris
Defendant:
Keith Franklin, Williamson County Sheriff and Williamson County Court House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartlett v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv01792
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bartlett
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Brown, Officer Justin T. Moore, Officer Zachary D. Fenton and others
Intervenor:
C. Norris Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Wanack et al
as 3:2018cv02104
Plaintiff:
Marc Norfleet
Defendant:
C/O Wanack, Norris and Tomas Spiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boston v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv01986
Plaintiff:
Norris Boston
Defendant:
State Of Illinois and Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Jewel-Osco et al
as 1:2016cv08819
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Defendant:
Jewel-Osco, Scott R. Koenhne, Michael Pauly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Wal Mart et al
as 1:2015cv08971
Defendant:
Wal Mart, Dan Perez, Dominick Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Holman et al
as 1:2015cv08153
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Defendant:
N. Holman and C. D'Arcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Will County Police Officer Bartunek
as 1:2015cv07306
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Defendant:
Will County Police Officer Bartunek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01176
Plaintiff:
John V Norris
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Hill Correctional Center, Trina Peed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Walgreens et al
as 1:2014cv03207
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Defendant:
Walgreens, Jose Reyes, Andrew Armitage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
