Cases 1 - 10 of 78
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS, CARINA LAGUZZI, DENNIS MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSEY v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv03318
Plaintiff:
QUAMAINE LEE MASSEY
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and LISA NESBITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, LEONARD VANDERLINDE, JULIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RONALD N. FICAROTTA, CHIEF JUDGE 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HEARD v. HARRIS
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS DERON HEARD
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01546
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN STITT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEDINGTON v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
