Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wick v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Wick, Sr.
Defendant:
USA, Wolfgang Hocholdinger, Eastern Mountana Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bullshows v. Big Horn County District Court et al
as 9:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Harry Bartholemew Bullshows, Sr.
Defendant:
Big Horn County District Court and Jay Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Paisley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Terry Boyd, Lewis Matthews and Kalah Paisley
Plaintiff:
Luke John Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Richard Junious Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Dr. Henderson, Officer Rowlen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldsmith v. Lewis and Clark County et al
as 6:2013cv00051
Defendant:
Lewis and Clark County, Leo Dutton and Benefis Spectrum Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darren Dee Goldsmith, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Richard Junious Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility, Shiela R. Kolar, Mary Jane Knisely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Rantz et al
as 6:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Redmond, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Rantz, Dr. Kohut, Dr. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron A Porter, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Royal G. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
