Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2019cv00104
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Dr. Alston, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travion Reid v. Scott Wilkes, et al
as 18-11502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVION REID
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT WILKES, Former Warden, RUTHIE SHELTON, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, MARY ALSTAN, Medical Director and others
Reid v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ruthie Shelton, Mary Alstan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Defendant:
Antonio Ross, Serena Chance and Scott Wilkes
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Antonio Ross and Serena Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2017cv03455
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince
Defendant:
Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections, Elizabeth Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wilkes, et al
as 4:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Antonio Bass and Serena Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
