Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. Shaw
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Freida Darlene Johnson
Defendant:
Albert Lee Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Shaw et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Freida Darlene Johnson
Defendant:
Albert Shaw, David Payne, Jay Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Freida Johnson and Freida Darlene Johnson-Shaw
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, David Payne, David Yewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shaw
as 3:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lee Brown
Defendant:
Honorable Mary Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Hampton et al
as 5:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Gray
Defendant:
Tony Hampton , Roger Persley , David C. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
James L. Shaw, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Grayson County Dentention Center Deputy Staff, Andy Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. The Sporting News et al
as 4:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Sporting News, Whitney Shaw, Ray Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Breckinridge County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00842
Plaintiff:
James White
Defendant:
Breckinridge County, Kentucky, Allen Shrewsberry, Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague and John Does
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
