Cases 1 - 10 of 116
WOODS v. COPELAND et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
ASHLEE COPELAND, W SUMMERS and MATTHEW J TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGUIRE-MOLLICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Evans v. Rozas et al
as 8:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Marrissa K. Rozas, Ashely G Allen, Jeffrey V. Catlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickmon v. CIA Agency et al
as 1:2023cv22391
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
CIA Agency, Rayshun Childs, Terry Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dustin v. Terry et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Ashley Terry, Billy Arnold, Sgt. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK AUNTAE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, MICHEAL ZAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Varnes et al
as 5:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Terry D Anderson
Defendant:
Shannon Varnes, R. Santiago, Thomas A Beckette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. City of Tampa et al
as 8:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Terry Bradley
Defendant:
City of Tampa, Kenneth Petrillo, Taylor Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Phyail et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Phyail, F. Perry, J. Idlerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Reaves
as 5:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
