Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wright et al v. Quay et al
as 1:2021cv02130
Defendant:
Jane Joe, Warden Herman Quay, MS/NP Brian Gerson and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Quay et al
as 1:2019cv02241
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Herman Quay
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Quay et al
as 1:2019cv01747
Plaintiff:
Rasheen Richardson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Herman Quay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Quay et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Plaintiff:
Mario E. Atkinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Herman Quay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calix v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv03980
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Herman Quay and John Does and Jane Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Andre Calix
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarron v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01903
Defendant:
Brian Gerson, Deborah Schult, Rame Awd and others
Plaintiff:
Frank McCarron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lopez v. Quay et al
as 1:2017cv02744
Defendant:
Official Jane Doe, Lt. John Doe and Warden Herman Quay
Plaintiff:
Rafael Lopez
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Podius et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv06121
Plaintiff:
William Alvarado, Sandy Batista, Errol Campbell and others
Defendant:
Counselor Bennett, Unit Manager J. Childress, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
