Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beall v. Stephens et al
as 4:2017cv00033
Defendant:
Claudia N Alexander, LVN, Dr. Denise DeShield, Criselda B Gochicoa, RN and others
Plaintiff:
David Beall
Notice Only Party:
Leddocket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Govan v. Community Education Centers Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv00113
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Stevens and Community Education Centers Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tyson Govan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Swift et.al.
as 4:2013cv00048
Defendant:
O Arteaga, Roger Bowers, SGT. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Darryll Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Aguilar et al
as 4:2013cv00024
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Raul Aguilar, Correctional Officer Melissa Gutierrez and Warden Steven Swift
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagwood v. Swift et al
as 4:2012cv00125
Defendant:
Mariad Agredano, Geraod S. Aranda, Michell L. Biese and others
Plaintiff:
TJ Hagwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. Seidel et al
as 4:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Teresa Celaya, Teresa Emerson, Mildred Fuentes and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Swift et al
as 4:2012cv00036
Defendant:
Capt. FNU Benavides, Kevin Blackshear, Charles Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
David Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Swift et al
as 4:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alvin Steven Brown
Defendant:
Major Ronnie Perez, Warden Steven Swift and Tonya Y Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakouri v. Raines et al
as 4:2011cv00126
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kevin Pinney, Unit Chaplain Gary E Raines and Warden Steven Swift
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
