Cases 1 - 10 of 44
WEBB v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
RICK ALLEN WEBB
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANSOM v. WEBB et al
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR
Defendant:
D ERIC WEBB, JENNIFER B WEBB and ALLESANDRO RAIMONDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, JULIA SLATER, Sheriff JEFF WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. WEBB et al
as 5:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
XAVIER HOWARD
Defendant:
SERGEANT WEBB, SERGEANT INGRAM and DOCTOR CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. WEBB et al
as 5:2021cv00177
Defendant:
REIDSVILLE STATE PRISON, SERGEANT WEBB, HANCOCK STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
XAVIER HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
WARDEN EDWARD TED PHILBIN, BRACEWELL, BRUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRACEWELL, BRUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al v. Reynolds
as 1:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Par, Jaivus Newton, Travis Wilson and others
Defendant:
Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. THOMPSON
as 5:2021cv00058
Defendant:
OFFICER MIKE THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
QUAIZEL M WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. DENTON et al
as 5:2021cv00056
Defendant:
NOAH DENTON, MILLEDGEVILLE COMMERCIAL INVESTORS and CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL INVESTORS
Plaintiff:
QUAIZEL M WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
