Cases 1 - 10 of 40
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, A. GANGI, C. SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05943
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, MICHAEL LNU and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMASSINI v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TOMASSINI
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. MENDOZA et al
as 3:2021cv17399
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, OMAR MENDOZA, OFFICER YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 3:2021cv16002
Plaintiff:
PRINCE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
