Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WILCOX v. HIRATA et al
as 1:2021cv17905
Plaintiff:
PERRY A. WILCOX
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, CHARLES WARREN, TILIYA A. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2021cv15798
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, NAKIA BOWMAN, CONSOLATA MULLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORREA-MARTINEZ v NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2021cv10599
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON, MR. PERRY, OFFICER UMANA and others
Plaintiff:
OSUALDO CORREA-MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRI v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv04858
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Defendant:
CTG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, GOURMET DINING CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON and PERRY A. WILCOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. BONDS et al
as 1:2019cv13450
Defendant:
JARVIS PERRY, WILLIE J. BONDS, MICHAEL SLUSARCZYK and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. PLOUSIS et al
as 2:2018cv11224
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant:
JOHNDOE, LOPEZ, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. LANIGAN
as 1:2017cv02864
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, PATRICK A. HOGAN, MS. BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. POGORZELSKI et al
as 3:2016cv08833
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PERRY THOMAS
Defendant:
I.R. POGORZELSKI, R. DIAZ and JOHN DOES 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. CHRISTENSEN et al
as 3:2016cv04822
Plaintiff:
TRICIA PERRY
Defendant:
CHRISTENSEN , LASALLE , MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
