Cases 1 - 10 of 3,806
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Jones
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
David L Spalding
Defendant:
United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Alexis McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly, Garfield County Detention Center and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prichard v. Stanek
as 5:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Tyson Stanek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy, III v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jerome Ferguson, S. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Albert Andrew Romero
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Susan Campbell and Robert Nogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Union City Community Corrections Center
as 5:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mendenhall
Defendant:
Union City Community Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdex v. Turnkey Medical et al
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical, Oklahoma County Commissioners and Vicki Zemp Behenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Oklahoma County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Demetric Hooper
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
