Cases 101 - 110 of 140
Thompson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Doctor Ritz, Doctor Feinerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Young et al
as 3:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
William Buck
Defendant:
Sgt Young, C/O Slavens, Lieutenant Callais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Michael Scott, Christine Brown, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuduj v. Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tom Tuduj
Defendant:
Eric M. Johnson, Christine Locchead, Sam Nowabasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, C/O Wagner, Lt. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Butler et al
as 1:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilik v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Richard Bilik
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., IDOC, Michael Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Radsheen W. Shepherd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Michael D Scott, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Javar Stewart
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Michael D Scott, Lieutenant Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Owens v. Marcus Myers, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS MYERS, c/o, Adjustment Committee, CAROL MCBRIDE, Lieutenant, c/o, Supervisor, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, CAO/Warden of PNK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
