Cases 131 - 140 of 140
Owens v. Director I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Owens
Defendant:
Director I.D.O.C., Unknown Party, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Doss
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Betsy Spiller, LaRue Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNish v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
David McNish
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Director I.D.O.C., Vipen Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jacob Jones
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Betsy Spiller, Director I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waltrip v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frank Waltrip
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Director of IDOC, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Shah et al
as 3:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ishmel Jackson
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Suzann Bailey, Director I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller, Assistant Warden Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Board of Cook County et al
as 1:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
Terrell Anderson
Defendant:
Board of Cook County, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Davy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Lee et al
as 3:2015cv01032
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Tracy Lee, Jacqueline Lashbrook, William Andrew Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
