Cases 141 - 150 of 419
Ellis v. Mertja et al
as 4:2019cv04221
Defendant:
. Lassard and . Mertja
Plaintiff:
David Lee Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01327
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Susan Prentice, . Renzi and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Illinois Department of Corrections Stateville Northern Reception Center et al
as 1:2019cv06423
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Stateville Northern Reception Center, Illinois Department of Corrections Sheridan Correctional Center and Kane County Jail
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Flowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01277
Defendant:
Amy Wykes, Bruce Hagie, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv04946
Defendant:
Pullum, Warden, Roland Lankah and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Lee et al
as 1:2019cv04937
Defendant:
Jennifer Lee, Bryant Chua, Lake County, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Awaan Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunley v. Daniels et al
as 1:2019cv01238
Defendant:
Jeffery Lee Ho, . Daniels and Scott Moats
Plaintiff:
Walter J Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Battle v. Naber et al
as 1:2019cv01224
Defendant:
S Naber and Justin Hammers
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Brookhart
as 3:2019cv00689
Defendant:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Plaintiff:
Lee Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Rippy et al
as 1:2019cv04318
Defendant:
Dr. McCormick, Other unknown named individuals who worked directly connected during the time that the alleged constitutional offenses occurred, Daniel Rippy and others
Plaintiff:
Simon A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
